From lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu  Wed Jan 16 12:05:22 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on
	research.cs.colorado.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham version=3.1.9
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:05:22 -0700
From: Liz Bradley <lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu>
To: Adam@Colorado.edu, Martha.Hanna@Colorado.edu, Joseph.Jupille@Colorado.edu,
        Bob.Sievers@Colorado.edu, walkerde@Colorado.edu,
        tsnow@origins.Colorado.edu, Jeff.Frykholm@Colorado.edu,
        Stephen.Jones@Colorado.edu, lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu,
        David.Clough@Colorado.edu, Michael.Bohn@Colorado.edu,
        Cecelia.Barry@Colorado.edu, Barbara.Bintliff@Colorado.edu,
        xsilas@tmail.com, Kim.Trenbath@Colorado.edu, lieschen@parachutes.com
Subject: follow up
Reply-to: lizb@cs.colorado.edu

Dear All: 

Apologies for the delay in my follow-up on monday's meeting.  My
300-person 8am freshman class is keeping me a bit busy.

We discussed COIA proposals (1.1.2) (1.2.1) (1.2.2) (1.2.5) (2.1.1)
(3.1) (3.2) (3.5) and (4.4).  Each proposal was assigned to a scribe:

(1.1.2)	     Ceal
(1.2.1)	     Martha
(1.2.2)	     Ted
(1.2.5)	     Lieschen
(2.1.1)	     Deward and (I think) Steve (but can't read my writing)
(3.1)	     Kim
(3.2)	     Bob
(3.5)	     Liz
(4.4)	     Dave

The scribe's job was to record the discussion and put together a short
(few sentences) summary.  If you have not already done so, please send
me your summaries THIS WEEK so we can circulate them by email.  (Many
thanks to Martha, Ted, and Kim for doing so already.)

We are scheduled for a slot in the Feb 7th BFA meeting to present our
results, so time is of the essence.

The goal for the next meeting is to finalize our recommendations,
including suggested implementation details, resource needs, and
responsibility chains

We will also have to decide upon the big-picture stuff: Who is our
intended audience, and what effects do we hope to have upon them,
based on our discussions of this information?  E.G., do we want the
BFA to pass a motion urging the administration to implement the
suggestions in our report?  Or something else?

One thing that came out loud and clear is that CU is already doing
many of these things - indeed, is a recognized national leader - and
that an important part of what we want to accomplish with this is to
raise faculty awareness of that fact.

Our next meeting is Feb 4th at 11am in CIRES 340, which is just down
the hall from the Ekeley room in which we met on monday.

Liz