From lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu  Sat Dec  8 07:56:56 2007
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 (2007-02-13) on
	research.cs.colorado.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham version=3.1.9
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 07:56:56 -0700
From: Liz Bradley <lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu>
To: Adam@Colorado.edu, Martha.Hanna@Colorado.edu, Joseph.Jupille@Colorado.edu,
        Bob.Sievers@Colorado.edu, walkerde@Colorado.edu,
        tsnow@origins.Colorado.edu, Jeff.Frykholm@Colorado.edu,
        Stephen.Jones@Colorado.edu, lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu,
        David.Clough@Colorado.edu, Michael.Bohn@Colorado.edu,
        Cecelia.Barry@Colorado.edu, Barbara.Bintliff@Colorado.edu,
        xsilas@tmail.com, Kim.Trenbath@Colorado.edu, lieschen@parachutes.com
Subject: December IAC meeting follow-up
Reply-to: lizb@cs.colorado.edu
cc: urien.nauenberg@Colorado.edu, phil.distefano@Colorado.edu,
        lizb@research.cs.colorado.edu

Dear All:

Because of weather, exams, travel, and illness, we had a small but
enthusiastic turnout at the IAC meeting yesterday.

The first item of discussion was the fact that the thursday football
game that Mike brought up last time apparently collides with an intro
chemistry exam involving 1000 people.  Athletics, the BAB, and the IAC
need to work together to plan around this problem and keep the campus
informed.  Ceal will bring this up in the senior staff meeting and Liz
will discuss it with Uriel.

Our next order of business was to finalize the committee's charge.
The "final" version is on the committee webpage:

    www.cs.colorado.edu/~lizb/bfa-iac.html 

...under the Dec 7th meeting item.

***PLEASE REVIEW IT** and send me your comments, suggestions, etc.  by
the end of next week (12/14).  After that, we will conduct an email
vote and forward our decision to the BFA for its approval.

We finished the meeting by sorting the COIA recommendations into
"triage" categories, as listed below:

"CU is already doing this"	

    (1.1.1) (1.1.3) (1.1.4) (most of 1.2.1) (1.2.3) 
    (everything in section 2 except 2.1.1)
    (3.3) (3.4) (4.3) (4.5)

"A national-level reform - we can't do much about it"

    (1.2.4)

"Problematic"

    (part of 3.2 - involvement in hiring of high-profile coaches)
    (4.2)  [this should go to the BAB]

"Should talk about this"  

    (1.1.2) (1.2.2) (1.2.5) (2.1.1) (3.1) (3.2) (3.5) (4.4)
    (part of 1.2.1: scheduling issues, major choice dissemination)

The items in that fourth category will be the focus of our agenda for
the next two meetings.

Thanks, and happy holidays.

Liz

p.s. apologies if you get two copies of this; my email client was
misbehaving yesterday afternoon, so I am re-sending.